National DNA Database

After the introduction of DNA profiles in the mid-80s, many nations began the compilation of the DNA profile database. These databases contain DNA profiles of criminal suspects and in some cases. DNA profiling for over two decades, but the database of DNA profiles from a very controversial issue.

The first such database was developed in Britain in 1995, with headquarters known as the NDNAD. The first database in the United States was the FBI's CODIS databaseoperational since 1998. In addition, many states have their own individual databases. database of California, for example, is the third largest in the world, after the British and CODIS database.

Regulations for these databases are different from country to country. In California and Britain, are arrested and charged with a crime requires a DNA sample before. The Government of Sweden, however, only takes DNA samples of people who were in prison for at least two years andrisk of committing another crime. The government of Portugal has recently decided to compile a DNA database of all citizens.

The countries also differ in the procedures for storing samples. For the UK database, the samples will be taken only during the arrest if the crime in question is one that would go to the person's criminal record. In England and Wales, even if the tariffs are dropped or are acquitted, the DNA is integrated. Scotland, however, requires the removal ofrecords when a person acquitted.

The FBI CODIS database, usually only for people who have been convicted of a crime necessary for the extraction of DNA with violent crimes. CODIS was originally created to store the information of sex offenders. At the state level, there are three states of mandatory DNA collection to convicted criminals.

The criticism of these databases in general is about the privacy and civil liberties concerns. The possibility of a DNA databaseInformation for all citizens is a daunting prospect for many, since this type of information could lead to disastrous results, are victims of abuse or when you change. Moreover, the errors may change during storage or use of this information leads to false beliefs. Considering how "water resistant" DNA testing is generally accepted that such a mistake could have tragic consequences.

If you have been arrested on suspicion of a crime in California, the state should require submission of a DNASample. can contribute to a criminal defense lawyer, is defending itself from these allegations. The San Jose defenders in criminal matters, Daniel Jensen has the experience to help you. To learn more about how you can help, please call Daniel Jensen today.

trading currency