law of strict liability

Strict liability is an interesting concept in law, if the defendant may be convicted solely on his guilty act (actus reus) without the need to demonstrate that he had a guilty mind (mens rea). Usually both actus reus and mens rea required for a criminal offense, and this article examines some possible scenarios on the exceptions - the rare cases of strict liability.

Imagine a situation where the accused was a company that produced food, including canned peas.The defendant was accused of selling food that was not the substance required by the buyer. A caterpillar in one of the cans of peas has been found, and although it was noted that the work was very high, and other preventive measures could be taken, the court held that the defendant was still liable. This example shows that apply in the field of food production and sale of strict liability is likely.

Consider another example of a case in which a manis convicted of driving while disqualified. A defense might be that he thought his time was up disqualified because he has sent his way back to him. But would not that be considered an adequate defense and the concept of strict liability may be applied.

These scenarios serve to highlight what is an interesting part of the law, but one that is often misunderstood. It should be noted that even in the crimes covered by strict liability, it is usually onlyThe respect of any part of the crime, and most of the crime, this mens rea.

homemortgage