A problem with the ignition interlock law in the State of New York

Pending legislation in New York State Assembly and Senate would put the already overburdened county probation through them saddled with the burden of managing a complex and unpopular that it is technology-intensive load. Meanwhile, we have all heard worrying ignition interlock: the disappointing high-tech equipment that is installed in a car and a "clean air" sample before starting the starter. This was made famous in the nationalMovie "The Forty Year Old Virgin" and then on the street when Lindsay Lohan was the picture of celebrities for the device. This was replaced by former Chicago Bears and Texas Longhorn running back after Cedric Benson charged with an ignition device lock on his vehicle had to install as a condition of bail.

Since November 2006, the technology of Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) was approved as part of its campaign to eliminate Drunk Driving. And for good reason - the statisticsdemonstrate the effectiveness of technology and consistently show that the recurrence rate significantly reduced, at least until the offender, the device is installed. (See Roth, Richard, VOA, Robert, and Marques, Paul, interlocks for first offenders effective? Traffic Injury Prevention 2007, 8 (4) :346-52)

New York State has a program lock switch has been on the books for over twenty years - one of the first in the nation (California in 1986 was the first time). In the beginning it was afteras a "pilot program" involved, and only distributed in seven counties throughout the state. other districts can complete the installation of equipment on an ad hoc basis in order. They did so only rarely, because the technology was emerging and the devices were filled with errors. His commitment was to the sentencing judge with discretion. By 2007 the insects, for the most part, have been identified and processed. The law of the State of New York has been expanded to include all counties and their use is now mandatory in some casesof "heavy drinking and driving (BAC 0.18 or higher), if probation is ordered and, in cases where the offender was convicted years ago of An alcohol-related offenses over the past five . However, the use of ignition lock is in the State of New York and the limited experience of the directors (probation) is irregular.

Currently, there are laws for the use of an ignition lock required following the DWI conviction, including any Make firstTime of crime. (See Senate Bill S-27A, January 7, 2009 and Assembly Bill A-07196, March 25, 2009). This program, if it becomes law will be followed by many other states, the "first offender" programs are: First of all, New Mexico and Arizona, for forward-looking model. And 'certainly a huge increase in the number of security devices are used in power in New York.

The impact on the crime is enormous. There's so obvious to use when developing and reduceless obvious impact on family members who want to drive (they too will have to blow-suck-blow into the contraption). And the cost is significant. Installation, monthly service, and removal fees easily exceed a thousand dollars a year. The minimum required installation will be one year for the first offender (and it could be a lifetime addition to the vehicle for the serial offender).

The aspect of the legislation that is particularly troubling is the fact that the program is to be administered by the City of probation - not the New York State Department of motor vehicles. This has the potential for a real disaster for the implementation of the program. In fact, I predict that in New York are actually 62 different programs (one for each region). This is driving up costs increase the budget required for the authors in each district of the Department test, create an administrative nightmare and lead to inconsistent application of the ActCondition.

The service is certainly a significant impact on a "list" for each district and the prices, depending on where you get to live in are different. (A quick call to the probation service in Albany, and Suffolk counties (both the original "pilot" courts confirm this point.) Variability may be caused because the less densely populated neighborhoods represent an obstacle for many service providers, a current problem. More likely we will see a series ofarbitrary rules that the community is set for the trial period for providers of business in this region. This is very costly for all parties involved. The problem is that the device is very nuanced. Each manufacturer has developed its own subtle way to meet the specifications for Federal certification of the unit. Within these limits there is ample opportunity for an administrator to require specific requirements of customers: the time between repeated trials of random stock; set-pointdamage caused, the number of hours before the vehicle will "lock out", to name a few.

Another reality is that the operation of the immobilizer is inherently complicated. The device interfaces with at least the horn, lights, stereo and car ignition. The large number of vehicles (in 1986 Oldsmobile, Mitsubishi 2000 and 2009 Ford Truck, for example) suggests several potential problems with wiring and maintenance of the lock. Although manufacturershave the problems solved, I guess that will require significant resources to train and guide the district level, who can order in remote regions Malfunction real excuses of injuries. On top of these themes, each manufacturer of a block of its proprietary interface to download data securely to the Department of probation. I believe the region could only say: this is the way they wish that the figures, but this approach will only exacerbate the lack ofof real competition among suppliers of the certified product. In many cases, manipulation of stored data will have significant technical expertise and the cost of fine-tuning for each community, many of the best factory units require the country to a place like Massachusetts, where the Registry of Motor Vehicles sent a single model for 'use throughout the state.

The legislature has the burden of program management at the Ministry of engine capacityVehicles. This is fiscally responsible, because the state would be economies of scale in the field of technological know-how to enjoy. A core team will be notified with all faults. Increase competition with suppliers of services that respond to a central location with requirements for well-known as market entry and exit protocols arbitrary divergent contrast from 62 separate administrators. Would strengthen the unity of the evaluation of dysfunction anduseless debate of false alarms from mouthwash and stale bread would cease as would be the IT department for the state to rapidly acquire a database of known errors in products quickly and be ready to identify real from imaginary crimes. While I think the law will increase road safety, I urge the legislature to shift the burden of administering the program for the Department of motor vehicles. Please let us know your thoughts.

loan Va Home Loan